The button-mashing gameplay, however, may leave you as sore as a sprinter with athlete's foot." Įric Bratcher of NextGen said of the PlayStation version in its March 2000 issue, "If you want Track & Field, this is it. If you're a fan of track & field extravaganzas, or just love multiplayer button-mashing, be sure to put this event into your personal decathlon." However, Vicious Sid said that the Dreamcast version "comes on strong with glossy visuals and authentic ESPN highlights. Yet you've never seen it look so good-in most events you can make out details of individuals in the crowd. The game's nostalgic gameplay, however, may bore some sports fans, making them feel like amused spectators." Eleven issues later, Ash said of the PlayStation 2 version, "You've probably played this game before-or at least one that's extremely similar. Jes Bickham of N64 Magazine gave the same console version 86% months before its European release, saying, "The defiantly 'old-skool' (ahem) gameplay may be the simplest you'll ever experience, but it just goes to show what a winning formula Konami came up with all those years ago - and they've done their legacy proud." įour-Eyed Dragon of GamePro said in its January 2000 issue that the PlayStation version "offers new events and sharper graphics. The earliest reviews of the game came from GameFan, Game Informer, and Nintendo Power, which gave the N64 version favorable reviews respectively in their April 2000 edition, even though the game itself was not out until months later. In Japan, Famitsu gave it a score of 30 out of 40 for the PlayStation version, 29 out of 40 for the N64 version, and 25 out of 40 for the Game Boy Color version. The PlayStation 2 and Dreamcast versions received "mixed or average reviews" according to the review aggregation website Metacritic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |